We calculeted PAR by Frouin's GLI PAR algorithm using
global mapped
radiance data.
Monthly PAR (e.g., May 2003)
is from daily PAR (e.g., 2003/05/01-31).
1. GLI V2.0 compared with SeaWiFS monthly
PAR
1.1 No vical coef
1.2 Using vical
coef
2. Comparison with GMS monthly PAR
Conversion from W/m^2 to Ein/m^2/day
PAR [Ein/m^2/day]=Solar
irradiance [W/m^2]*rt
rt=c_vbyl*c_pbye*(24*60*60)/p2mol*(1.-ref)*m2e;
(=0.1896)
c_vbyl=0.43;c_pbye=2.77E18;p2mol=6.022E23;ref=0.07;m2ein=1.193;m2e=1.193;
(GMS
Solar irradiance (0.05-deg resolution) is Tohoku Univ. SWR monthly
data in April 2003)
Kawamura et al., Journal of Oceanography, Vol. 54, pp.
457 to 464. 1998
3. Comparison between V2.0 and V2.2 (2003/08/12)upper (or X-axis): V2.0, lower (or Y-axis): V2.2
After modifications in treatment of localtime and albedo (2003/04/10),upper (or X-axis): V2.0, lower (or
Y-axis): V2.2
Test of sampling scheme of global
radiance data
4. 8-day average PAR using new radiance data and ver.2 & 2.2 algorithms
a) Ver.2.0 v.s. SeaWiFS (1-8 May 2003)
b) Ver.2.2 v.s. SeaWiFS (1-8 May 2003)
(ref, next period 9-16 May 2003)
c) Ver.2.0 v.s. Ver.2.2 (1-8 May
2003)
d) Ver 2.2 v.s. Ver.2.2a (1 May 2003)
e) Ver.2.2a v.s. SeaWiFS (1-8 May 2003)
f) Ver 2.0 v.s. Ver.2.2 (11 April 2003),
difference scaled [-10, 10]
g) Ver 2.0 v.s. Ver.2.2a (11 April 2003), difference scaled
[-10, 10]
h) Ver 2.0 v.s. Ver.2.2b (17 May
2003), difference scaled [-10, 10]
i) Ver 2.0 v.s. Ver.2.2b (17 May - 1
June 2003), difference scaled [-10, 10]
gray image-1, gray image-2
j) Ver 2.0 v.s. SeaWiFS (17 May - 1
June 2003), difference scaled [-10, 10]
k) Ver 2.2b v.s. SeaWiFS (17 May - 1
June 2003), difference scaled [-10, 10]
gray image-1, gray image-2
m) Local time on 17 May 2003